Which Framework is Better CodeIgniter or Laravel For PHP Training?
For those who are already a part and parcel of the PHP community already know which one is good, pros and cons of using both these frameworks, and which one suits them better for web app development. Well, what about those who are just entering and looking for getting enrolled in some PHP training institute? They might not know whats best for them. or what’s best in the market? Or what’s best as a beginner? Well, don’t freak out, let me help you with that. Here are some of the major differences between CodeIgniter and Laravel.
Its an open source software for developing web apps using PHP. It is based on the famous model view controller development pattern and controller classes are an extremely essential part of the development. It can be modified making use of HMVC which enables the developers to maintain modular grouping of the controller.
It is a free open source PHP framework created by the Taylor Otwell. It is based on the MVC and Symfony. Certain features of Laravel are modular packaging system along with a dedicated dependency manager, several ways of managing relational database and aids for app deployment and maintenance.
CodeIgniter Or Laravel For PHP Training
1) PHP 7 Support
With the big launch of the server side programming language – PHP 7, plenty of new features & improvements has been added to the PHP development. It enables the developers to improve their performance of web apps & also assist in lesser memory consumption. The good news is that both CodeIgniter & Laravel supports the seventh version of PHP. However, there are certain developers who have addressed some issues while developing and testing the app with CodeIgniter.
2) Database Support
CodeIgniter and Laravel both support many databases like MySQL, Microsoft Bi, PostgreSQL, and MangoDB. Well, here CodeIgniter has upper hand as it supports an increased number of the database than Laravel like IBM DB2, ORACLE, orientdb, and JDBC.
3) REST API Development
The controllers availed by the Laravel allows the developers to create several REST APIs without having to pour extra effort and time. The developers can set the $restful property as true into the controller for building custom REST APIs eliminating the need to write any additional code. On a contrary, CodeIgniter doesn’t have any specific features to ease up the development of REST APIs. The developers are bound to code additionally for building custom REST APIs if they want to develop apps with CodeIgniter.
4) Learning Curve
The learning curve of CodeIgniter is small and easy compared to that with Laravel. Coming to features and tools, Laravel is one step ahead which makes learning it more difficult and time-consuming. The complexity level for learning Laravel is high & beginners find CodeIgniter easier to learn and get started with.
5) Community Support
CodeIgniter and Laravel are considered as Open Source PHP Framework. Each of the frameworks has a great support from the PHP community. The members of both the communities are equally active & online help can be available easily. In case of any query or emergency, while developing a web app, prompt help can be made available.
Laravel provides authentication class which helps the developers in authorization and authentication. This class allows the users to keep the web application secure by integrating user login and keeping the routes secure with the help of filters. Codeigniter fails to get such inbuilt authentication features, they have to authorize and authenticate the user by writing CodeIgniter custom extensions.
Well, both the frameworks are equally competitive and both have pros / cons of their own. But, we won’t be hanging you midway. We will serve you what exactly you should pick. Are you a fresher? If yes, then learning Laravel will lift up your difficulty level. So, its CodeIgniter for you. Take live project training and start learning CodeIgniter for the start. Are you an experienced PHP developer? If yes, shifting your ways to the Laravel is what you should be doing.